<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Television – Time Warner no better than Cox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/</link>
	<description>Daily Thoughts of a (Hopefully) Critical Thinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:55:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maliki</title>
		<link>http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Maliki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Ok in response to alot of what I&#039;m reading, first any techie knows the complexity @ which a cable box must go through to process the multitude of signals being sent.  In the old days yes a T.V. was very simple to operate but with no hor or vert lines untrue, first of all that is caused by ingress which is when signals leak into an improperly connected or damaged coaxial line. Also DVR all of these boxes now are basically computers what does heat do to components in a computer, case in point do you place your tv on top of said box or in an inclosed space or with dvd vcrs on top all these things are bad,  Yes the older DVRs not so good, but with newer technology comes kinks so yes I hope sooner than l8r they are worked out as well.  I howerever may just be very lucky because I don&#039;t have as many problems as others I talk to and I use Cox.  As far as the techs there can&#039;t say because I have had to contact them maybe two times in well about eight years I guess.  So as for me I am happy and feel sorry for those of you who are not and if I was you I would issue my concerns to your provider and see what thier response is.  Well that was just my two cents worth and it was interesting reading what you all had to say thx for your time and have a good one. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok in response to alot of what I&#8217;m reading, first any techie knows the complexity @ which a cable box must go through to process the multitude of signals being sent.  In the old days yes a T.V. was very simple to operate but with no hor or vert lines untrue, first of all that is caused by ingress which is when signals leak into an improperly connected or damaged coaxial line. Also DVR all of these boxes now are basically computers what does heat do to components in a computer, case in point do you place your tv on top of said box or in an inclosed space or with dvd vcrs on top all these things are bad,  Yes the older DVRs not so good, but with newer technology comes kinks so yes I hope sooner than l8r they are worked out as well.  I howerever may just be very lucky because I don&#8217;t have as many problems as others I talk to and I use Cox.  As far as the techs there can&#8217;t say because I have had to contact them maybe two times in well about eight years I guess.  So as for me I am happy and feel sorry for those of you who are not and if I was you I would issue my concerns to your provider and see what thier response is.  Well that was just my two cents worth and it was interesting reading what you all had to say thx for your time and have a good one. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wvmmrh</title>
		<link>http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>wvmmrh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>my on demand channels have been  impossibe to get for  a month.i&#039;m not at home most of the time in the days to be able to have them come in to look at the box. but i don&#039;t believe it&#039;s the box. ..i called their support number three hours ago,the guy told me to unplug the box for 5 minutes then 45 minutes later try the on demand channels again.  not only can i not get the on demand channels,but while all the other channels come in okay,the menu hasn&#039;t updated and the channel info as well..i still see &#039;to be announced&#039;  everywhere. it&#039;s been 3 hours that i&#039;ve had the box connected/. 

i&#039;d go satellite but i&#039;ve heard that it goes out when it storms.and here in dallas it storms alot both in summer and in winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my on demand channels have been  impossibe to get for  a month.i&#8217;m not at home most of the time in the days to be able to have them come in to look at the box. but i don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s the box. ..i called their support number three hours ago,the guy told me to unplug the box for 5 minutes then 45 minutes later try the on demand channels again.  not only can i not get the on demand channels,but while all the other channels come in okay,the menu hasn&#8217;t updated and the channel info as well..i still see &#8216;to be announced&#8217;  everywhere. it&#8217;s been 3 hours that i&#8217;ve had the box connected/. </p>
<p>i&#8217;d go satellite but i&#8217;ve heard that it goes out when it storms.and here in dallas it storms alot both in summer and in winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norberthaupt</title>
		<link>http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>norberthaupt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 05:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>When you call technical support and ask why the unit reboots itself, sometimes several times a day, each time taking 10 minutes or more to come back up, the tech support people tell you that they have a real problem with the units and that there is nothing they can do about it, since they have some contract with the manufacturer that they cannot get out of. All users keep calling about units rebooting themselves.

Great product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you call technical support and ask why the unit reboots itself, sometimes several times a day, each time taking 10 minutes or more to come back up, the tech support people tell you that they have a real problem with the units and that there is nothing they can do about it, since they have some contract with the manufacturer that they cannot get out of. All users keep calling about units rebooting themselves.</p>
<p>Great product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norberthaupt.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/digital-television-%e2%80%93-time-warner-no-better-than-cox/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Time Warner is horrible.  We have it also and hate it.  We have not been getting any information on our channels, and it takes 10 seconds for the guide menu to come up.  No cable is better than Time Warner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Warner is horrible.  We have it also and hate it.  We have not been getting any information on our channels, and it takes 10 seconds for the guide menu to come up.  No cable is better than Time Warner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
